The accused was sentenced by the trial court to death for recovery of delay in re-expression of the evidence of the power of section 2 302 (b), on the first visit of the High Court affirmation. The investigating officer came in the way of recording the statements of the dark witnesses, preparing the investigative report, etc., but he did so for the recovery of important pieces of evidence such as empty, blood-stained land and cycle recovery. Had to wait for the light and further delay. It was alleged that the accused and the perpetrator were going to the site of the incident. At least the investigating officer could preserve the bicycle and the blood-stained land, when he could secure the deceased's chapel and replace it with his second Nor could the evidence prove that the recovery of the weapons of the crime was free from doubt and, as such, the motive was allegedly not credible and serious suspicion attacked him. Suspect was beyond the legal obligation to prove the crime of an offender, in which it failed, therefore, the accused has to benefit The Supreme Court set aside the accused's conviction and sentence and punish the accused were acquitted him. Appeal allowed
