Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MOOSA versus STATE

Prior to the arrest of section 498, the bailiffs, all other accused persons involved in the affidavit of the affidavit, except the accused, were admitted on bail by the trial court or the High Court complainant, and three injured witnesses of the prosecution, their statements I, they were not appointed. Support the prosecution's story about the accused's involvement in the crime commission

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• AMANULLAH SHAH v. SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2011 SCMR 1584
• MUHAMMAD ARIF v. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SIALKOT 2011 SCMR 1591
• PUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION v. Mst. AISHA NAWAZ 2011 SCMR 1602
• MUHAMMAD ABBASI v. State 2011 SCMR 1606
• SHAHID IMRAN v. State 2011 SCMR 1614
• DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, KASUR v. ZAHID ALI 2011 SCMR 1618
• SHAHID FAROOQ v. State 2011 SCMR 1619
• AL-RAHAM TRAVELS AND TOURS (PVT.) LTD. v. MINISTRY OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS, HAJJ, ZAKAT AND USHR 2011 SCMR 1621

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

top civil advocates from Ali Chak lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes