Section 10 (3) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 354A & 452 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 6 (b) of Zina Bil Jabbar, assault or use of criminal force and stripping of her clothes. ? And the sole statement of the prosecution, the torture of the domestic accused, the torture, the absence of the accused, the trial court sentenced him to 20 years imprisonment and the same was maintained by the High Court. That there were no signs of violence. The prosecution's body, therefore, should have extended the benefit of the doubt to the fact that the truth of the prosecution's statement was inherently good in its statement, since no evidence could be made on the basis of the conviction alone because the accused. The punishment was missing from your reality. The evidence that rape was provided on the basis of coercive and concrete evidence, including medical evidence, was not necessary to uphold the Supreme Court's right to commit adultery. The CE version refused to bring it in jeopardy. Because it was unfounded, no one would want to discredit his innocent daughter for the rest of her life simply because of a small matter, which her future Supreme Court refused to interfere with. The accused was convicted and sentenced by the courts below the appeal
