Find a Lawyer

INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD ZAMAN

Article 4 Constitution Pakistan, Article 212 (3) Pro-Pharma promotion after restoration in service, claiming dismissal from employment on absenteeism for four (4) months and appeal on the basis of sympathy by authorized 15 (15) days. The claim for rehabilitation of the recipient is to treat the intervention period as unpaid leave. The service tribunal accepted the appeal / Appellant's claim that the appellant did not produce any documentary evidence in the record to show that he was absent due to his wife's illness, the Supreme Court found the circumstances I put aside the unwanted decision.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• MUHAMMAD ISHAQ v. State 2011 SCMR 1646
• ABDUL GHAFOOR v. Mst. MARRIAM BIBI 2011 SCMR 1648
• Mst. FIRDOUS BATOOL v. EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER 2011 SCMR 1655
• MUHAMMAD YOUNAS v. MUHAMMAD TUFAIL 2011 SCMR 1657
• HABIBULLAH v. State 2011 SCMR 1665
• MUHAMMAD HANIF v. COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX 2011 SCMR 1672
• SHAHID HUSSAIN alias MU LTANI v. State 2011 SCMR 1673
• Mst. NADIA MALIK v. MAKKI CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. 2011 SCMR 1675

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

list of supreme court advocates from Jauharabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes