AL-JEHAD TRUST versus LAHORE HIGH COURT THROUGH REGISTRAR
Arts 1840) and the 203 Criminal Law Amendment Act (XL of 1958), Section 3 and 4 of the Immigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), the District and Sessions Judge of the Supreme Court under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution 18 and 22 Has been set before As a Special Judge (Central), the member inspection team for three years lodged a complaint against the Special Judge to the Special Court that in spite of his best efforts, he ordered the dismissal of the complaint approved by the Special Judge in a criminal case. Can't retrieve copy. The same was not found in the Judicial File under Sections 18 and 22 of the Immigration Ordinance 1979, and its formal request to obtain a copy of it led to the surprise visit of the Special Judge's court and the prosecution by another district. The file was sent back to take over. And the session judge accused the High Judge of returning the Special Judge and his posting on the post of OSD, issuing show cause notices to him and initiating disciplinary proceedings against him by the Special Judge of the High Court. That such acts against him were declared illegal and unconstitutional because another District and Sessions Judge was unable to conduct raids and files from his court under the administrative control of the Ministry of Law, Government of Pakistan in this case. Was. Was able to admit such a complaint. The Valdetti records show that such a surprise visit to the Special Judge's Court was made by another district and session judge on the telephonic instruction of a member under which a record of such criminal case was sought, notice of such matter. I was brought in by the Chief Justice of the High Court, S.
