Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAMEED versus STATE

Article 353F (2B), a constitution of Pakistan, disputed a woman generally for stripping her attire that, according to the FIR and sketch maps, allegedly occurred inside the room at midnight. And the provisions of section 354A, PPC were not attracted because there was no justification for a public exhibition so that the appeals could be dismissed so that these submissions be considered.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• SAEED AHMAD v. State 2011 SCMR 1686
• AL-JEHAD TRUST v. LAHORE HIGH COURT through Registrar 2011 SCMR 1688
• RIAZ JAFAR NATIQ v. MUHAMMAD NADEEM DAR 2011 SCMR 1708
• KARACHI CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, KARACHI v. SINDH LABOUR COURT NO. V, KARACHI 2011 SCMR 1709
• IRSHAD MUHAMMAD SHAH v. HESCO 2011 SCMR 1717
• KHALID MEHMOOD v. State 2011 SCMR 1719
• Mst. HAJIRAN v. INAYATULLAH 2011 SCMR 1720
• SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT LAHORE v. FAIZ AHMAD DOGAR 2011 SCMR 1722

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

advocate from Kot Bunglow lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes