The Rs 8 and Rs 8 promotions, the types of seniority related to the appellant's complaints were that he was senior to the respondents and had a notification to declare, so it was officially issued correctly one of two cases of publicity. On a regular basis and another. Completion of the vacancy as a stop-gap arrangement in the public interest, based on the Acting Charge, which was temporarily / ad hoc promotion, such a distinction was made by the Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Exchange) Rules Which was a regular development under which an officer's case could be considered on the condition that he possessed the required qualifications and met other conditions of such development while the Sindh Civil Servant (appointment) , Promotion and exchange) rules were for development under Rule 8A of 1974. Based on the Acting Charge, this promotion is only a matter of a senior officer who was otherwise eligible for promotion but did not have a specific length. The deputy, it is understood that there is allegedly no harm in giving notice to the appellant about the appellant, as it was reasonable and legal to declare the appellant as senior to the defendant, who held the field. What was, therefore, appellant's seniority to the claimant was allowed to appeal
