Find a Lawyer

CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AUQAF versus ALLAH BAKHSH

Section 11 and 7 Notice of Occupation of Dedicated Property by the Chief Administrator of the Period There is no evidence on record that the property was dedicated to Waqf or has since been admitted to the defendant and He was the appellant (appellant) for several hundred years, did not produce any evidence on record to show that the property belonging to the respondents was `dedicated 'which means the Punjab Dedicated Property Ordinance, 1979 1979 1979 and earlier. The final result of the truth was uncertain ideas and not contrary to law. Supreme Court dismisses departmental appeal

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• Dr. ASMA ALI v. MASOOD SAJJAD 2011 PLD 221
• JAMILA KHATOON v. AISH MUHAMMAD 2011 SCMR 222
• NISAR AHMAD v. MASOOD AKHTAR 2011 SCMR 226
• PETROSIN CORPORATION PVT. LTD. v. OGDC through Managing Director 2011 PLD 235
• MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. MUSHTAQ 2011 SCMR 239
• Dr. S.M. INKISAR ALI v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2011 PLC(CS) 240
• Hafiz TASSADUQ HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD DIN through Legal Heirs 2011 PLD 241
• Malik NAVEED AHMED v. Mst. AASIA 2011 SCMR 243

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

ask a advocate free from Orakzai lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes