Find a Lawyer

CHIEF EXECUTIVE, HESCO (WAPDA), HYDERABAD versus SIKANDAR ALI KHAWAJA

Section 3 & S Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Constitution Pakistan, Article 1212 (3) Compulsory retirement from employee of WAPDA, illegal lodging taken by the appellant, show cause notice by the right engineer Issues of Issuing Inquiry Service The Tribunal has a legal authority to prosecute the appellant regarding a questionnaire about a three-year interchange of reduction of time scales by two steps with no action. There was no regular inquiry for and the appellant was authorized to issue show cause notice. They were not challenged by the service tribunal, which reflects their involvement in such charges. The impeachment decision was based on the proper definition of the material available on the record, which led to the Supreme Court dismissing the petition for leave to appeal.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. MUSHTAQ 2011 SCMR 239
• Dr. S.M. INKISAR ALI v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2011 PLC(CS) 240
• Hafiz TASSADUQ HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD DIN through Legal Heirs 2011 PLD 241
• Malik NAVEED AHMED v. Mst. AASIA 2011 SCMR 243
• MUHAMMAD ALI GOHAR ZAIDI v. HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION 2011 SCMR 247
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. MUHAMMAD QASIM 2011 SCMR 249
• GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Secretary, Housing and Physical Planning, Peshawar v. Haji JAMSHER KHAN 2011 PLD 250
• Capt. (Retd.) KHALID ZAMAN v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Establishment Division 2011 PLC(CS) 251

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

law websites from Okara lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes