HUMAN RIGHTS CASES NO.57701-P, 57719-G, 57754-P, 58152-P, 59036-S, 59060-P, 54187-P AND 58118-K OF 2 versus
Section 2 (1) (b) (ii) Federal Investigation Agency Act, 1974 (VIII of 1975), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 184 (3) Constitution Investigation of Contract Employees by a Regular Police Officer Was going Under the supervision of the Director General of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), who had contract-based influence, in the regulatory forces, especially the police and the FIA, where people had to work well in discipline. , The men overseeing the forces were allowed and they were in charge. According to the definition of section 2 (1) (b) (II) of the contract-based Civil Servants Act, 1973, a person who was employed on the contract did not come to appreciate the authority of a public servant to provide such contractual employee. Command and maintain discipline can be imagined by the fact that if a person was not a civil servant himself, he was considered to be bound only by the terms and conditions of his contract and not by law. The tradition held was a violation of the law, such contractor would only be subject to action under the contract. The Supreme Court asked the Attorney General. It is in the interest of the government to promote junior officers, who are looking forward to development and should be encouraged rather than hired on contract basis unless their services are essential. But in regards to disciplinary forces such as the police and the FIA, etc.
