Section 302 (b) and 379 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 103 murder morning and the possibility of re-examining evidence of theft were sentenced to AMD and death. Claims for confession of two witnesses who were present at the scene of the crime, but they themselves were confession witnesses and confessed their enmity with the accused, both witnesses could not explain the reason for their presence with the victim. Instead, their conduct was contrary to the normal behavior of ordinary human beings, so their testimony was unbelievable. The prosecution's witnesses were also lied to by a site plan in which blood was not raised from the ground. The girl was also stained with blood and was not found by the investigating officer on the spot. The same was presented to him, although where the ocular account was denied, there were articles in which the defects were of uncertain charge against the accused because in the absence of direct evidence, self-produced evidence against the accused. Could not be charged in the house and the accused were acquitted and they were acquitted of the charge, appeal was allowed
