Find a Lawyer

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, LAHORE versus SHAFIQ TRADERS

Extraordinary circumstances required for such extension of the approval of the Final Diagnostics Order during the period extended by the Additional Director Valuation to the Collector's Validity Proposal are neither abnormal nor collector's in its proposal The records do not refer to extraordinary circumstances, nor were the circumstances recorded to extend the collector time so that the final grounds for the use of force to extend the time under the terms of section 81 (2) of the Customs Act, 1969 were absent. The final decree was considered to have been set aside in the circumstances.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• IFTIKHAR MEHMOOD v. QAISER IFTIKHAR 2011 SCMR 1165
• NISAR AHMED v. State 2011 SCMR 1169
• SALEEMUDDIN v. State 2011 SCMR 1171
• QAISER MASUD v. SECRETARY LAW AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2011 SCMR 1181
• IRSHAD AHMED v. State 2011 SCMR 1190
• Mehr NOOR MUHAMMAD v. NAZIR AHMED 2011 CLD 1190
• Dr. R.A. SIYAL v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through the Secretary Establishment 2011 SCMR 1194
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment v. GHULAM SHABBIR JISKANI 2011 SCMR 1198

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes