Section 2 302 (b) Motivating Reaction of Qatil Ahmed Proof, Failure to Prove the Quantity of Reduced Situation The death sentence was changed by the High Court to life imprisonment only on the basis that the prosecution did not take any action against the accused. Failed to prove the purpose. The motive was always relevant to the crime, which is why the accused took the law into his own hands and committed the crime. The motive was, in fact, the basis of the structure that ultimately led to the culmination of the crime. When the motive was so fundamental and relevant to the commission of the crime, in each case it had to be tolerated, while the motive decision was set in the FIR and it was reiterated at the trial stage that the parties had There was a heated debate over religious matters, if religious sentiments were always the cause of a provocation in mind, if something was said against it. A. Under the conviction of an individual and such feelings, when not only the heated debate but also the exchange took place, the offense was committed in compelling circumstances, therefore, the High Court rightly commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment. Gone, if the High Court used discretion to impose lesser punishment, they were not artificial or against the record and were enough to turn the death sentence into life imprisonment. Was deleted
