Find a Lawyer

NISAR AHMED versus STATE

Section 2 302 (b) Qatil Ahmed sentenced to scrutiny of evidence, lack of defense did not deny the death of the accused by the accused, however, he claimed to have killed the accused while acting in his defense. , When the victim committed abuse in his home. Placing a defense plea was merely a claim and he could not justify the murder of the victim at the hands of the accused as the circumstances leading to the killing were not understandable and since the prosecution had not taken the court in this matter. Confidence, permission to execute the suspect was not secure

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. State 2011 SCMR 1157
• Ch. ALI HASSAN v. PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB 2011 SCMR 1160
• QADIR BAKSH v. ALLAH DEWAYA 2011 SCMR 1162
• IFTIKHAR MEHMOOD v. QAISER IFTIKHAR 2011 SCMR 1165
• SALEEMUDDIN v. State 2011 SCMR 1171
• QAISER MASUD v. SECRETARY LAW AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2011 SCMR 1181
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, LAHORE v. SHAFIQ TRADERS 2011 PTD 1185
• IRSHAD AHMED v. State 2011 SCMR 1190

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

solicitors from Kotli lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes