Claiming to file a lawsuit for declaration of title deed, defendants accused I4nd of altering the question in favor of the defendants, who were accused of fraudulent decisions and injunctions in favor of the plaintiffs. The lawsuit was approved by two courts. Set aside by the High Court for the exercise of jurisdiction over the amendment. The property plaintiffs filed a lawsuit in favor of the defendants on the date of cancellation of the allotment of land in favor of the defendants on 2098 1989. Until 1989, when this lawsuit was filed, there was nothing on record that the actions taken by the plaintiffs for the purpose of protecting their interests, with respect to the land that was not available, were not prevented. Was how and when the controversial variable first came to the knowledge of the plaintiffs, except that no confusion could be created without any special mention when the plaintiff was l About the change in. And the question is, what actions were taken by them in favor of the defendants and for the protection of their interests, and no specific question was given if they were allotted the land and they did not What took place and why they remained silent for a period. The plaintiffs for 28 years not only failed to prove that the defendants had committed fraud in their favor in 1956 in the underground land conversion and that in the case filed by the plaintiffs from time to time, 17 195 1956 The defamation was imposed while the cancellation lawsuit was filed in 2098 1989, and it will hopefully be stopped.
