MUHAMMAD SAEED AHMED versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF LAW, ISLAMABAD SECRETARIAT
Section 4 (L), 173, 200 and 204 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Investigation Object, Scope and Purpose of Investigation Officer Scope Petitioner Determination of Jurisdiction in Question and Submitted by Investigation Was dissatisfied with the investigative report. The officer argued that because some of the named defendants were made prosecution witnesses, the defendant argued that the trial court had begun recording the evidence and that the complainant had dismissed such request by the trial court, The Correctional Investigation Agency was not authorized to detect the alleged crime or innocence of the accused. The defendant testified and described the offense of crime or innocence and seeking such police under the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, or the Police Act, 1861, and under the provisions of the Police Order, 2002 Search after recording. The purpose of the Investigative Agency of the Law of the Court of Drew was to collect evidence and not convict anyone or otherwise alter some of the accused as witnesses, the Investigating Officer submitted during his investigation of not violating his authority. If dissatisfied with the evidence examined, the trial court will properly weigh and examine the complainant. Complaint requests were dismissed in circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
