ACTION REGARDING VIOLATION OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT RULES\', 2004 versus
Investigating the Constitution, Article 184 (3) of the Supreme Court, the Principal Director Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), accused of autonomous jurisdiction, stated that it was 4 days before and after the registration of the case. The order has been approved. The Director-General was in question with the FIA Effect; the Director-General was equally responsible for not producing the FIA's arrest, and instead of allowing his director to make progress in this matter, Was providing shelter to the accused. The Additional Director was the FIA, who took all necessary steps to arrest the accused in question. The Supreme Court further directed the Investigating Officer that if on further investigation he would come to the conclusion that the accused had been granted asylum by the Director General, the FIA, then he should also take action against the Director General as per law. No one was above the law \ r \ n
