Sections (a) and c (c) of the investigation of the evidence cannot be ruled out, the presence of two injured eye witnesses at the scene cannot be denied. On the occasion the presence of the complainant was immediately acknowledged. The report provided details of the incident, as well as the statements of the accused were identified with their specific characters who were not only on the test of identifying the witnesses' testimony, but also on the Ocular before the trial court. The testimony was consistent on all material points, and the evidence was from medical evidence, intended to motivate and protect against twenty-eight protected crimes. The suspect was charged with weapons recovered from the accused, which was allegedly provoked by the Belt Defense and by the main suspect, which was not supported by any evidence or circumstance. The trial company and the convicts of the main accused were retained under these conditions by the participating company neither picked up any accused nor shot any person in the area from the vacated area on the spot nor fired any bullets. No matching weapons, including alleged counter-terrorism recovered from a co-accused. Act 1997 or section co-accused was convicted of five suspects under 7 (a). But his death sentence on each count was sentenced to life imprisonment under the circumstances and the conviction and punishment of the accomplices under section 7 (c) of the said Act were retained, However, all his convictions were ordered to run concurrently.
