Taking advantage of the evidence seized by Section 9 (C) intoxicants, the suspect was found standing near a sack of drugs at the time of the raid, despite the incident that took place in a busy public place in a town where many private individuals. At present, the investigating officer did not attempt to arrange for any witnesses to the location, who in any way saw the suspect in any way with any of the ten alleged drugs lying on the road in the open space, the two attorneys for the recovery. None of them had stated that he saw the accused either coming with the sacks or going with him. Only by standing close to them did the defendant's sack prove not to be an active possession of the sack, the accused was specifically removed from his oath under section 340 (2), CRPC. In front of the trial court, the sacks of drugs belonged to another person who had gone missing after watching the police raiding party, and his statement could also be true. The informant or anyone else, either by car or by any other means. He was not seen loading and unloading sacks of intoxicants, the contents of these sacks and the suspect's knowledge of his possession were not established despite delay of more than seven days. The prosecution did not specify whether to send drug samples to Chemical Examiner for the analysis, the suspect was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances.
