Find a Lawyer

AZMAT ALIAS LAMBRU versus STATE

Section 302 (b) / 34 Qatl e amd Evidence investigated Determination of conviction, reduction of death sentence and conviction of convicted offenders by courts was considered 13 km away from the police station incident and The deceased was head constable, the 24-hour delay in filing the FIR was strange and his explanation could not be applied. He could not be recovered from any place, yet the victim remained in the hospital for more than 33 days. Attempted to record only one record, his statement was in the beginning and after that the accused was not retained, but his Services sentence was changed to life imprisonment conditions

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• Malik TAJ MUHAMMAD v. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2011 PLC(CS) 817
• SUO MOTU CASE NO. 24 OF 2010 2011 SCMR 817
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. State 2011 SCMR 820
• SUO MOTU CASE NO. 18 OF 2010 v. Violation of Public Procurement Rules, 2004 2011 PLD 821
• SECRETARY (SCHOOLS), GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT v. YASMEEN BANO 2011 PLC(CS) 825
• ABDUL RASHEED v. State 2011 SCMR 828
• THE STATE through Director-General Anti-Narcotics Force, Rawalpindi v. SULTAN SHAH 2011 SCMR 829
• ABDUL HAYEE v. State 2011 SCMR 830

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

solicitors from Peshawar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes