In section 2 302 (b), the identity of the accused in the identification parade will be irrelevant, even in the presence of other solid evidence in the identification parade, because the complainant not only made the accused in the identification parade. Identification, but during that time the trial, which had been at the complainant's house for a reasonable period of time, therefore, did not raise any question about the identity of the accused by the complainant, therefore, the complainant with the accused Was not charged with any hostility, it is a credible, reliable and credible ocular testimony that complained of Three eyewitnesses, including Dahi, were corroborated by medical evidence and their recovery was proven to be a crime, therefore, the death sentence of one of the accused was changed to life imprisonment by the High Court. Reasons, such as a deceased person who never suffered a fatal injury as a confession, were additionally lacking sufficient material to prove the truth of the matter and the determination, the prosecution's evidence suggests. There were no forecasts for the commission and the accused was not relaxed by the High Court. Reducing his death sentence to the circumstances had caused the fatal injury to the co-accused and therefore his case was controversial with the accused.
