Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus STATE

Attempts to co-operate with Section 2b (b) and at e am Qatil Ahmed and Qatal were made in the light of the incident when the complainant was the victim's brother and brother of the victim and it cannot be expected that he was the accused. Replaces. There was a dispute over land distribution between the parties for the real culprit. The record did not suggest that the injured witness suffered firearms at the hands of the accused, immediately after the FIR gave a complete picture of the incident. The defendant, with full support of the medical evidence, the presence of a loaded pistol with which he shot three of his nephews on one of the religious festivals one day, demonstrated his determination and sternness. And there was no reason to benefit from it. Due to his old age, the accused was sentenced to life imprisonment. T is maintained

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• SIKANDAR ZAMAN v. State 2011 SCMR 870
• MUHAMMAD NADEEM v. State 2011 SCMR 872
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM RAHI v. STATE 2011 SCMR 877
• Ms. KAUSER PERVEEN v. KASB BANK LIMITED, LAHORE 2011 CLD 883
• HABIB BANK LTD. v. RAMAN ALI HEMANI 2011 SCMR 892
• MUHAMMAD YAQOOB v. State 2011 SCMR 893
• GOVERNMENT OF NORTH-WEST FRONTIER PROVINCE through Secretary, Agriculture, Livestock and Cooperative v. ABDULLAH KHAN 2011 SCMR 898
• RAB NAWAZ v. State 2011 SCMR 901

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

list of supreme court advocates from Rabwah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes