Article 12 Legal Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 117 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 113 Suite is accused of specific performance of oral contract of sale of land on the lease of land of the parties who entered into charges in 1973. Whether or not the proof of its sale would be that Borden would lie to the plaintiff in such a case in 1982, after the plaintiff received a notice on the plaintiff's request to expel the plaintiff from the land filed by him. The lawsuit was a sale contract. From 1974, the suit land will go from the date of filing such case on which the defendant purchased the suit land for Rs. 11,000 in 1973/74. Were paid. The defendant admitted to receiving Rs 9,400 from the respondent through a check receipt of Rs 10,400 from the defendant, which, if accepted, would be inadmissible, the plaintiff acquiring a suit worth Rs 11,000. Such payment would have been paid as rent for, all of which would indicate that the plaintiff's oral evidence presented to establish a contract of sale was substantiated by other cases of litigation when the plaintiff defended it. Failure to prove that residential properties on this suit land were allotted. The suit is decided in the circumstances of the suit \ r \ n
