Article 8 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 114, AXXVI, R9 and O XLVII, R1 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) Identification of suit land The suit land should be identified by the local commission. The plaintiffs' 6-march decree passed by the plaintiffs in favor of the plaintiff on the basis of a report related to the crossing of the 4-march threshold in which the appellate court High Court judge reversed the trial court's revocation decision of the trial court review petition. The restoration hearing. Order of ex parte proceedings against the defendant for grant of additional 2 marl of land to the defendant and approval of the review petition by ex parte High Court by the plaintiff for separation of ex parte proceedings by the High Court. The request was not proven to be valid, the review was approved, which had obtained the plaintiff's plaintiff a 4-Marl land to the maximum extent of the decree that did not challenge the High Court's decision. Plaintiff's request to grant the plaintiff an additional 2-Marl land order was revised, though she objected to the trial court on such report, but on the basis of which she accepted the decree of receiving 4 Marl After the review court accepted the plaintiff's decision its correctness. The report cannot be questioned until the remaining 2-Mar High Court in the scope of the review scandal that an error was corrected in view of the record, in the presence of the identified parties on the suit land, a senior Revenue Officer. Such a report was not divisible. The Supreme Court refused to grant leave to appeal the circumstances.
