MUHAMMAD ALI SATAKZAI versus APPOINTING AUTHORITY, THROUGH REGISTRAR BALOCHISTAN HIGH COURT
The proposed Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 2A, 175, 199 and 203 constitutional requests are subject to the regular selection of appointments through appointments by Additional District and Sessions Judges, Civil Judges / Judicial Magistrates and Judicial Officers, Chief Justice High Court. Under the constitutional jurisdiction, the order of the Public Service Commission was passed, which prevented such commission from permanently conducting test / interview on any such post in addition to the Government of Balochistan's Additional District and Sessions Judges and District and Sessions. Judges have been instructed to make necessary amendments within 60 days. Service Rules, 2002, Balochistan Civil Judges / Judicial Magistrate Service Rules, 2002 and Balochistan Judges and Members' Council Shura Service Rules 2002, under which the High Court is to conduct a test / interview for the recruitment of Judicial Officers through a Commission comprising the Administrative Management Committee. Can be enabled Under the process of appointing a Judicial Officer of a Committee of three or more judges, the concept of separation of judicial officers from the post of Executive Petitioners was constituted by the Public Service Committee. Who could not claim to have any exclusive right to regulate their services. Contrary to the conditions on which they were appointed and the conditions under which they accepted their appointments, the controversial declaration and the directions of the High Court were not open to any exception. The Supreme Court refused to grant leave of appeal. done
