Find a Lawyer

KHALID MEHMOOD versus STATE

Sections 306 (c), 307 and 308 constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) are not binding on the convict / convict / convict of the accused / convicted solicitor. Along with the court, the High Court also did not draw their attention to the relevant provisions in accordance with Sections 306 (c), 307 and 308, PPC and a remand of the matter could be obtained so that the legal offer could be dismissed. Coins and decisions can be made. Ignoring serious prejudice against the applicant, the Supreme Court granted leave to consider privileges, and turned the petition into an appeal.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• Syed DILAWAR MADAD v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2011 PLC(CS) 1086
• HABIBULLAH BHUTTO v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS 2011 PLC(CS) 1094
• PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, EMPLOYEES\' OLD-AGE BENEFITS 2011 SCMR 1102
• Mst. PARVEEN AKHTAR v. NIAZ ALI 2011 SCMR 1107
• TAJ MUHAMMAD AFRIDI v. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE PRESIDENT SECRETARIAT 2011 SCMR 1111
• PAKISTAN' TELEVISION CORP. LTD. v. CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2011 SCMR 1117
• SALEEM AKHTAR SIDDIQUI v. SHUJAH AHMED 2011 PLC(CS) 1119
• GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, KARACHI v. RAFIQUE AHMED AGHA 2011 PLC(CS) 1123

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Skardu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes