Article 204 contempt of court Act (LXIV of 1976), Section 3/4 contempt of court directed the Secretary, Establishment Division to consider the applicant's promotion case at a regular meeting held in February, 2008. He said that the directive for the petitioner's Supreme Court case was held at the Central Selection Board meeting held on September 11, 2008 and was rejected because it failed to meet the required aggregate limit of 70 percent marks, Applicant's case has been placed in a re-meeting. On 17 7 2008 and he was postponed on the basis that he did not receive PER for one year after his supersession on 11 2 2008, the dispute being that since the applicant was posted as OSD. Therefore, no PER was required under Para 2 87 of the Guide. Performance Evaluation Report The Central Selection Board, in the circumstances, was instructed to consider the applicant's case at this meeting held in November. y
