Section 302 (b) / 34, 201 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 161 Causes Conviction and Missing Proof of Crime The benefit of the suspicion was the widow of the deceased in the FIR's delay in recording witnesses' statements. ? He was charged with poisoning her husband with the help of his co-accused, with whom he was accused of illicit relations, and the only witness to the incident was told that he was the minor daughter of the deceased and the accused at trial. The court is high as well. The court convicted the accused and sentenced him to life imprisonment before his death in a conscious condition. But during this period, he has not made any allegations about his role in either of these two roles. An FIR of this poisoning case was filed four days after the incident, with no clear explanation, during which a prosecutor, Nessie, played an active role. The witness's statement was recorded for the first time ten days after the incident with the eyewitness at the age of 11, who was generally knowledgeable, and was specifically told that he had full knowledge of the incident. ? When his mother presented poison to his late father for the second time in Dal, he could not remain silent and could immediately disclose to his deceased father immediately before eating such poisonous food. The prosecution was extremely suspicious, impossible and weak, but the material suspects were found to be guilty of prosecution by two suspects.
