Find a Lawyer

AHMAD YAHYA KHAN versus HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION THROUGH CHAIRMAN

Section 10 of the Higher Education Commission Employees (Recruitment) Rules, 2009 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 199, 25 and 185 (3) of the Civil Service Promotion Constitutional Request Under Article 199, the High Court Maintainability Release was approved by the Supreme Court for scrutiny. The departmental rules adopted by the Tho Controlling Authority (Chief Executive of Pakistan) needed to be promoted precisely, saying that the rules were not legal rules. Did the applicant rightfully request the High Court's jurisdiction under Article 199 to resolve his complaint because the Commission is performing its duties in relation to the affairs of the Federation and whether the applicant, Protection of constitutional clauses under Article 25 etc. entitled to be sought as one of the employees

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• IRSHAD AHMED v. State 2011 SCMR 1190
• Mehr NOOR MUHAMMAD v. NAZIR AHMED 2011 CLD 1190
• Dr. R.A. SIYAL v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through the Secretary Establishment 2011 SCMR 1194
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment v. GHULAM SHABBIR JISKANI 2011 SCMR 1198
• Dr. R.A. SIYAL v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment 2011 PLC(CS) 1211
• Mst. TASLEEM BIBI v. STATE 2011 SCMR 1215
• AHMAD YAHYA KHAN v. HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION through Chairman 2011 PLC(CS) 1218
• CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB v. Malik ASIF HAYAT 2011 SCMR 1220

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

tax advocates from Harnai lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes