Find a Lawyer

HAMID NADEEM versus STATE

The trial court sentenced the unidentified accused to sections 302 (b) and 377 of the Criminal Code (v. 1898), section 103 Qatel MD and Siddiqui repressive evidence and sentenced him to life imprisonment. On 8 7 2001, the prosecution was handed over to a witness who had submitted it to the office of the Franzik Science Laboratory on 16 7 2001, and also to the Forensic Science Laboratory with 5 live pills that he was known for. The report especially lost its sanctity. The issue of widespread compensation, where immediate precaution was required for safe administration of justice, was allegedly not related to the recovery of cloths stained with the blood of the deceased and there was no positive The report was not available on record, it was suspected. And the accused was entitled to take advantage of the Supreme Court.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• AHMAD YAHYA KHAN v. HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION through Chairman 2011 PLC(CS) 1218
• CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB v. Malik ASIF HAYAT 2011 SCMR 1220
• MAJID NAEEM v. State 2011 SCMR 1227
• CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE (F.B.R.) v. RECKITT BENCHKISER PAKISTAN LTD. 2011 PTD 1232
• GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, through Chief Secretary v. Sardar ZAFAR IQBAL DOGAR 2011 SCMR 1239
• Engineer MAJEED AHMED MEMON v. LIAQUAT UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES, JAMSHORO 2011 PLC(CS) 1242
• Sardar MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. (now KPK) through Collector 2011 SCMR 1244
• AIR LEAGUE OF PIAC EMPLOYEES v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN M/O. LABOUR AND MANPOWER DIVISION ISLAMABAD 2011 SCMR 1254

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

online advocate from Daharki lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes