Find a Lawyer

SARDAR MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. (NOW KPK) THROUGH COLLECTOR

Section 23 Compensation Determination of irrigated land in an acquired area adjacent to an industrial estate and within 1000/1100 feet between the two main roads and the canal. Are close Potential value for industrial, commercial and residential colonies, etc. Ownership of other acquired land in adjoining area was increased by the authority with regard to the property acquired at higher cost of compensation.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE (F.B.R.) v. RECKITT BENCHKISER PAKISTAN LTD. 2011 PTD 1232
• HAMID NADEEM v. State 2011 SCMR 1233
• GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, through Chief Secretary v. Sardar ZAFAR IQBAL DOGAR 2011 SCMR 1239
• Engineer MAJEED AHMED MEMON v. LIAQUAT UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES, JAMSHORO 2011 PLC(CS) 1242
• AIR LEAGUE OF PIAC EMPLOYEES v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN M/O. LABOUR AND MANPOWER DIVISION ISLAMABAD 2011 SCMR 1254
• DIRECTOR-GENERAL, MILITARY LAND AND CANTONMENT DEPARTMENT v. Dr. Capt. NAZEER AHMED BALOCH 2011 PLC(CS) 1257
• GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. (Now KPK) through Chief Secretary v. KALEEM SHAH 2011 PLC(CS) 1272
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE), KARACHI v. PAKISTAN STATE OIL KARACHI 2011 SCMR 1279

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

famous supreme court advocate from Kandiaro lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes