Find a Lawyer

NASEER AHMED versus STATE

The accused, who compromised Article 302 (b) / 34 of the Criminal Code (v. 1898), Article 345, Pakistan, Article 185 (3), submitted the money to the court in the form of a Defense Saving Certificate in the names of the three minors. The deceased's legal heritage had on the basis of a compromise between the parties, waived the accused between the parties and had already taken the affidavit and had no objection to the accused's fate. The suspects were acquitted under conditions

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE), KARACHI v. PAKISTAN STATE OIL KARACHI 2011 SCMR 1279
• PUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION v. Mst. AISHA NAWAZ 2011 PLC(CS) 1284
• MUHAMMAD SHARIF SANDHU v. DISTRICT ACCOUNTS OFFICER 2011 SCMR 1287
• MUHAMMAD HAFEEZ v. WAPDA through Chairman 2011 SCMR 1289
• TANVEER QAYYUM PIRACHA v. Mian NASEER AHMED 2011 SCMR 1294
• NAVEED AMJAD v. ABDULLAH NAVEED 2011 SCMR 1296
• GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Cabinet Division v. Dr. M. AKBAR RAJPUT 2011 SCMR 1298
• ASJAD HUSSAIN v. CHIEF ENGINEER (ADMINISTRATION) POWER, WAPDA 2011 SCMR 1302

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

jobs for advocates from Blitang lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes