Find a Lawyer

NAVEED AMJAD versus ABDULLAH NAVEED

Section 5 and Schedule of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 185 (3) and 1991 Provision for rehabilitation of juvenile children by suit family court with 10% in appeal filed by the father of the appellate court under 10 2010 2010 At various rates, the annual increase by his father from his desert date in 2003 has prompted the High Court's father to say that the High Court cannot decide on the restoration of the previous effect. There was no objection. To the extent that the father will pay restitution with a 10% annual increase from the date of the decision of the Family Court with a 10% annual increase in the non-judgmental decision, the Supreme Court has, instead, with the consent of the parties. \ n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• MUHAMMAD SHARIF SANDHU v. DISTRICT ACCOUNTS OFFICER 2011 SCMR 1287
• MUHAMMAD HAFEEZ v. WAPDA through Chairman 2011 SCMR 1289
• NASEER AHMED v. State 2011 SCMR 1292
• TANVEER QAYYUM PIRACHA v. Mian NASEER AHMED 2011 SCMR 1294
• GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Cabinet Division v. Dr. M. AKBAR RAJPUT 2011 SCMR 1298
• ASJAD HUSSAIN v. CHIEF ENGINEER (ADMINISTRATION) POWER, WAPDA 2011 SCMR 1302
• Dr. TAHIRA HUSSAIN v. Shaikh WASEEM AHMED 2011 SCMR 1304
• ABDUL MAJEED v. MANAGER, PIA, LAHORE 2011 PLC(CS) 1304

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

Pakistan, top advocate family court from Khyber Agency lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes