Respondents to the Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 56 Withdrawal Request, claiming that the demolished houses were not in possession before filing the eviction request, Additional The eviction order passed by the District Controller by the District Judge and the validity of the High Court allowed the Supreme Court to consider whether the principles contained in section 56 of the Contract Act, 1872, frustrated the High Court and The Additional District Judge has correctly applied the facts of the present case. Whether evacuation requests to evacuate respondents from demolished premises was available to the tenant, especially when it was not physically occupied. And if the premises were not physically occupied at the time of the submission of the respondent's dismissal request and in such case the eviction request was not before the controller of the rent, then the dispute between the parties should be made only by the respondent. The source was not limited to the collection of some outstanding dues. The tenant had no jurisdiction over which dispute and could only be referred to the civil court by the applicant for resolution.
