Find a Lawyer

LUBNA PASHA versus BRIG. M. SHAFIULLAH QURESHI

Section 4 Service Tribunal Limited Delay Appeal, Delay of 4 days from time to day for the time restriction on confirmation of appeal against the service dismissal order was to be defined, but related to the delay by the appellant. No application has been filed even by the oral appellant requesting that the appellant apply for the usual delay in the illness taken by the appellant without any proof, so late Will not meet the requirements for contempt of court; the delay in favor of the appellant exceeds the jurisdiction to consider contempt of court. Free time was banned, excluded

Related judgments — Service Tribunal Sindh, 2011

• ABDUL GHAFFAR v. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SOUTH ZONE, KARACHI 2011 PLC(CS) 387
• GOHRAM SOOMRO v. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EDUCATION 2011 PLC(CS) 526
• GHULAM MUHAMMAD TUNIO v. PROVINCE OF SINDH 2011 PLC(CS) 1027
• SHAFIQ-UR-REHMAN v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2011 PLC(CS) 12

All Service Tribunal Sindh judgments of 2011 →

advocates from Ubaro lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes