MUNEER AHMAD versus ASSISTANT CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCE
Article 199 General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 24 Daily Wage Employees' Denial of Civil Service Natural Justice, Right to Hear Applicable Principles and Opportunity to Accuse Scope Petitioners' Daily Wage Employees' Civil Aviation Authority Was dismissed (as authority), and his earlier filed constitutional petition sought to enforce the High Court order, whereby the respondent authority was ordered to provide applicants with an opportunity to be heard. After and after considering the applicant's case for rehabilitation and recording an appropriate reasonable order T was right to argue backpackers. As per the High Court order, the applicants were not compensated for hearing. Under this order of the High Court, there was no need for the respondent authority to restore the applicants, but it did not give the authority the opportunity to hear the case after hearing. Need to consider. However, neither the applicants were presented with any statement about the allegations nor were they given the proper opportunity and opportunity to deny the allegations by submitting written statements or submitting oral evidence and recording complaints against them. The petitioners were neither mentioned nor there was any debate on the authenticity of such complaints. No inquiry was made before the approval of the disputed order nor recorded any statement of witnesses against the petitioners. Neither went nor was the opportunity provided for the interim examination of any witness against the applicant That the applicants were given notice for a personal hearing and the authority had taken ten steps
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
