Section 2 (2 (b)) Qatiel appreciating the evidence, reducing the circumstances The sentence, the reduction of the case was the murder of a young man of 28/29 years, who was set in the light of day in the presence of witnesses. The complainant was not denied by the defense, with the specific role of firing at the time, day and place of the accused's head, according to their statements to all witnesses. Was excluded, witnesses with no noticeable deviation or improvement, during cross-inspection, remained consistent with each other, regarding the actual incident; and defended their statements. The material contradiction could not be identified, enough to refute their testimony, especially since the Syed witness for a long time suffered severe cross-examination, but nothing in favor of defense. Can be removed, the question of substitution, does not arise in view of the relationship of the complainant with the deceased, who was his real mother, the real mother does not allow his son's real killer to be punished, and an innocent person Was named in the light of day, the fact that the accused knew the prosecution's witnesses, the possibility of false identification, would not be adjusted This was because they were explained by witnesses in the place of their presence. And immediately after reporting the matter to the police, their presence was confirmed at the relevant time, the unidentified person was accompanied by the accused at the time of their presence, designating persons to search the unknown person by the complainant. Was. The motive behind the incident was not proved beyond any doubt against the charges, prosecutor Ain
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
