MRS. SHAMA RAUF versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Section 48 and 45B Sales Tax Rules, 2006, R71 (2) (b) Sales Tax General Order No. 1 of 1998 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000V), 9 (2) (b). Recovery of outstanding dues from a director of a company tax settlement company, who has given up ownership, related to the period before the company's review, valid notice issued by the department to the complainant, including the complainant, for receipt of dues. Were for. Following the order of the High Court Pilia, the process of issuing and auctioning the non-service order of the notice of recovery until the complainant received information from his bank and actually obtained a certified copy of the order. Was referred to the department for failing to refute its claim that the department did not actually present any evidence on the service of the order that the old record could not be found on Form 29 The copy was also not authenticated by the SEC on the basis that it had a rack on it. Was not available FIRE has not accepted the claim of the Security and Exchange Commission of Pakistan has rejected a complaint and not them, but the form is displayed based on the failure to confirm 29. It was not available in the records kept by him, copies of the tax deductions of the taxpayers and the subsequent approval of the assessment orders by the department, it was acknowledged that the valuation of the shares of the gifted company by the complainant. The assessment in his son's hand was made for the year 2000 2001, with the change in ownership and then the assessment of the wealth tax as well
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2012
