MUHAMMAD SALEEM SARWAR versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Complaint against the conduct of sections 120 and 177 os Comprehensive Audit / Complainant was informed by the Commissioner Internal Revenue that the Federal Board of Revenue had sued him through a random computer belt for conducting comprehensive audit conduct for the tax year 2008. Is selected. Referring to the simultaneous audit conduct in both the Income Tax and Sales Tax cases), the complainant protested that there was no acceptable way of conducting a comprehensive audit audit \ Frees \ comprehensive audit income tax laws. I was nowhere to be seen and sales tax reviews were not the turning point in earnings per se, but the complainant's income for purposes of simultaneous income tax and sales taxation through an os comprehensive audit of Was the method adopted to determine, Comprehensive audits were complained against and the complainant was double jeopardized. In the Income Tax and Sales Tax regulations, a taxpayer subjected to multiple audit proceedings, simultaneously under two different laws, and Creates an atmosphere of uncertainty and increases the likelihood of unexpected risks for the complainant. Failure to comply with the High Court decision in the department is set forth in Section 2 (3) of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance. The subject will lead to corruption, to the 2000 Federal Board of Revenue for conducting a comprehensive audit conduct of the complainant. It was recommended to withdraw the notices issued for 15 days and accompany the report. Compliance within 5 days after that \ r \ n
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2012
