MUHAMMAD ASHIQ versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Sections 148, 162 and 205 constitute the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000V), show cause notice to the unlawful imposition of the taxpayer under section 2 (3) and section 162 (1) / 205 of the 9 Income Tax Ordinance Submitted with, 2001, without specifying a tax year, he asked why the tax was allegedly deducted at the time of importation of his goods under section 148 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, the complainant. Explained that the tax was deducted at the time of the import. The matter of import goods was in accordance with the notification and the orders of the Federal Board of Revenue Complainants also claimed. Because the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 was illegal order passed under section 162 (1) was not allowed to answer the appropriate time. Refusing to give the complainant an appropriate opportunity to respond to a valid notification on the final showcase notice. And when the complainant first requested, the adjustment was made under section 2 (3) of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2001, failure to mention any tax year in the showcase notice; Eligibility and Negligence Equivalent to Departmental Corruption Under Section 2 (3) of the Establishment of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, the 2000 Federal Tax Ombudsman instructed the Federal Board of Revenue to instruct the Commissioner, the Income Tax Ordinance 2001. Recommendation to adopt a review jurisdiction under 122A. Disapproved orders passed within 21 days of the relevant year under the law under section 626 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001. And report compliance within 7 days thereafter
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2012
