WAHEED SHAHZAD BUTT versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Sections 153 (1) (b) and 153 (6) of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) (ii) Public Interest Complaint Corporate Taxpayers Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) Taxpayer's Web Portal Defaults on Electronic Income Tax Return Complainant states that the recipient of income by providing / providing services receivable under Sections 153 (1) (b) and 153 (6) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 For corporate taxpayers, electronic income tax returns (IT1) provided misleading information to taxpayers for the tax year 2010 placed on the Federal Board of Revenue's (FBR) web portal. And the tax paid by them was not being properly calculated. That the electronic income tax declaration has seriously reduced the income tax liability for the taxpayer, which was not prepared to receive the taxpayer's income in 2010 and taxed under the marginal tax regime, In addition, the Electronic Returns (Service Sector) designed for Income Taxable Corporate Taxpayers under the Minimum Tax Government has demonstrated disqualification, incompetence and ineligibility by the relevant authorities and the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2001, Federal Tax. Was equivalent to the mill management organized under section 2 (3) (ii) of the Ombudsman. The Federal Board of Revenue should be recommended to submit a foolproof electronic return to the official web portal of the Federal Board of Revenue in the future. Determine the loss of revenue due to defective e-returns and direct the field formations, without imposing any penalty or default charge on the relevant taxpayers.
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2012
