IRSHAD AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD JAHANGIR BASHAR, SECRETARY MINISTRY OF EDUCATION. ISLAMABAD
In Sections 12 and 17, the contempt court civil service applicants petitioned that the High Court, through its decision, directed the authorities to consider regularizing the services of the applicants against the authorities for contempt of court. The request was made and demanded that the authorities be instructed. Issue notification to regularize the service of the applicants, otherwise the High Court started contempt of court proceedings against the authorities for contempt of their orders. Had not happened The pending decision before the Supreme Court is linked to the conclusion that it did not fully support the follow up issue of the policy presented by the Cabinet Committee, it was revealed that the applicant's case was the scope of such policy. Didn't get in the car. In this way they cannot claim relief in any way, as was claimed by the applicants, which can be said to have been infringed by the authorities. The Supreme Court judgment was informed that the applicant's version was not supported, the original original criminal applications were dismissed.
