O VII, Rr 10 & 11 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Articles 42 and 54 of the plaintiff's resignation and the permanent injunction restraining suit were dealt with by the observation that the plaintiff had the right to retain possession of the public house. Is right Only in the period of two months was the order passed by the plaintiff, which was passed without touching the merits of the case, after excluding the final judgment of the Accurate Civil Procedure Code, 1908, or excluding the matter. A method for disposal was fixed. A case may be dismissed under Order VII, Rule 11 of the CPC. And to dismiss a suit with mere observation (as in the present case) is not mentioned in the law. There was an order without jurisdiction, and without the proper use of the court's mind, the trial court was obliged to examine the plaintiff for the purpose of determining whether the case should be withdrawn or dismissed. The order to CPC is given under Order VII, RR 10 and 11. The plaintiff must be ordered to speak and a civil suit cannot be disposed of by writing only a few lines. Only the orders of the courts are in violation of the law; the High Court set aside the unwanted orders that allowed revision,
