Find a Lawyer

SAEED AHMAD versus MRS. REHANA ZAHID

Article 17 Constitution of Pakistan Constitution 199 Constitution Petition The removal of the tenant due to the personal need of the landlord and the expiration of the tenancy agreement was ordered by the appellate court to remove the tenant (applicant). The right was protected under section 17 (6). In the ordinance which provided that if the landlord or any of his family had not taken possession within six months of the tenant's eviction, the tenant would have the right to take possession of it. Apply to the rental controller for maintenance. About the tenant The personal statement of the homeowner's personal statement, therefore, was sufficient to approve the eviction order because, according to the tenant's law, the tenancy / rental agreement was terminated between the parties. And was not expanded. The tenant who was also responsible for rejecting such a score was excluded \ r \ n

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2012

• FIVE STAR BUILDING MATERIALS AND GEN. ORDER SUPPLIERS v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Islamabad 2012 PTD 999
• SHAHAB-UD-DIN v. ZUBAIR ASLAM 2012 MLD 1002
• PAKISTAN ORDNANCE FACTORIES (POF) WAH, CANTT. v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE ADJUDICATION), ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 1016
• MUHAMMAD KHUSHAL v. CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Chairman, C.D.A., Islamabad 2012 CLC 1063
• Sheikh MUHAMMAD TAHIR v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1075
• Mian MUHAMMAD AJMAL v. Syed NAZAR HUSSAIN SHAH BUKHARI (deceased) 2012 CLC 1088
• NUSRAT BATOOL v. D.G. N.A.R.C. 2012 CLC 1129
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, COMPANIES ZONE, ISLAMABAD v. ISLAMABAD PUBLICATIONS (PVT.) LTD. 2012 PTD 1136

All Islamabad judgments of 2012 →

top advocate from Bhakkar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes