Find a Lawyer

PEACOCK RESTAURANT, MOTORWAY SERVICE AREA, (SOUTH), CHAKWAL versus COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, (APPEALS-III), ISLAMABAD

Sections 2 (41), 3, 25 and 38 (3) assess the sales tax on the basis of taxable disposable income tax returns The assessee's assertion of the taxable and non-taxable supply assertion did not deny that the taxpayers. Did not provide a sales tax record. The sales tax department should have set the amount of taxable and non-taxable supply by taxpayers, which the department failed to provide evidence that the income tax. The full cost of the supplies shown in the backbone is one. Taxpayer Supplies \ Taxpayers claimed that it distributed taxable and non-taxable supplies on both applicable forums but that fact was not seen and the appeal also ruled that the taxpayers' reasoning was justified. Wrong driving was the equivalent. Reducing sales tax liabilities was certainly the result of some reconciliation exercises conducted by sales tax officials with taxpayers. Taxpayers' record sessions were inappropriate The department did not provide any valid justification for neglecting the sales division adjacent to the restaurant, and the unprofitable records maintained by taxpayers The sale was confirmed by the shops. Sales tax could not be charged on the mere speculation of the taxpayer, the taxpayer's appellate tribunal admitting it with documentary evidence and accepting it was r \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Inland, 2012

• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, R.T.O., FAISALABAD v. KAMAL FABRICS, FAISALABAD 2012 PTD 453
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ISLAMABAD v. COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, (APPEALS-I), ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 459
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, R.T.O., GUJRANWALA v. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE 2012 PTD 467
• MEHAR DASTGIR LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR INDUSTRIES, MULTAN v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, MULTAN 2012 PTD 472
• AL-MEHDI INTERNATIONAL SHAH PLAZA, MUREE ROAD, RAWALPINDI v. C.I.T.(A), RAWALPINDI 2012 PTD 498
• HUB POWER COMPANY LTD., ISLAMABAD v. COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), ZONE-III, LTU, ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 507
• MIDAS COMMUNICATIONS CO., ISLAMABAD v. C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 518
• BLACK GOLD INDUSTRY, LAHORE v. C.I.T., P.T.O., LAHORE 2012 PTD 532

All Inland judgments of 2012 →

list of advocates from Lawrence pur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes