Find a Lawyer

BLACK GOLD INDUSTRY, LAHORE versus C.I.T., P.T.O., LAHORE

Section 122 Amendment Amendment For Sale Estimates The difference between selling and selling prices was considered as gross profit and was included in earnings Accuracy The tax officer rejected the commercial version on the declaration that production The complete record of the record was not prepared, the record shows that the taxpayers produced the production record and said that the fact was confirmed by the certified copy of the relevant order sheet which the First Appellate Authority observed in the order. The taxpayer was also registered with the sales tax department and made the purchase All records must be available in the form of sales. The sales tax return tax officer may have recorded a substantial inspection of the sales and purchases announced that the tax had openly confessed to the first appellate authority that the details of the matters to which the taxing officer had estimated. Didn't compete with the sales tax payer. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the first appellate authority's order under N122 (9) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 through a notice under Secato as to reject the appellate authority's conclusions regarding the commercial version announced before the tribunal. No content was kept for.

Related judgments — Inland, 2012

• PEACOCK RESTAURANT, MOTORWAY SERVICE AREA, (SOUTH), CHAKWAL v. COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, (APPEALS-III), ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 478
• AL-MEHDI INTERNATIONAL SHAH PLAZA, MUREE ROAD, RAWALPINDI v. C.I.T.(A), RAWALPINDI 2012 PTD 498
• HUB POWER COMPANY LTD., ISLAMABAD v. COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), ZONE-III, LTU, ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 507
• MIDAS COMMUNICATIONS CO., ISLAMABAD v. C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 518
• MUHAMMAD SAEED v. C.I.R., ZONE-I, R.T.O., PESHAWAR 2012 PTD 547
• C.I.R., LEGAL DIVISION, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, ISLAMABAD v. T.F. PIPES (PVT.) LTD., ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 577
• MND EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION LTD. v. C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 581
• COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, FAISALABAD v. KAMAL FABRICS, FAISALABAD 2012 PTD 619

All Inland judgments of 2012 →

best law firms from Mansehra lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes