Section 4, 7, 8, 8A, 10, 22, 26, 11 (2), 33, 34, 36 (1) and 73 Zero Rating Input Tax Suppliers Blacklisted Revenue Once Claimed The status of the list was assigned to any supplier. Receipts issued by a blacklisted person were considered to be invalid and input on such receipts could be obtained from the registered person. Taxpayers claimed that a previous order had been passed and provided appropriate opportunity at the decision-making level. Has not been This notice was not registered with the registered person or authorized person. That the order in the appeal was prejudicial and discriminatory and that the First Appellate Authority had discriminated against the appellant and in other appeals the Authority had allowed other registered persons to relieve on the same issue. The appellate tribunal had set aside the order to blacklist the supplier. And even the withdrawal and approval of the input and claim activities associated with the periods of June and August 2004, when the supplier was an active taxpayer and regularly filed returns. Information that adversely affects the rights of the registered person cannot be prejudiced and potentially enforceable. And that the refund rules cannot be applied to a former appellate tribunal, in which case, in the original, the order was vacated and the appeal registered by the appellate tribunal was accepted.
