Find a Lawyer

CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD versus C.I.R., R.T.O., FAISALABAD

The first appellate authority to establish a section 5B appeal petitioner urged that the receipt of a contentious tax demand before the first appeal hearing is equivalent to denying the lawfully recognized right of appeal. And before taking drastic tax collection steps, the dispute complaint should be decided by an independent forum. If the tax demand arising as a result of the order was not precluded as a central appeal before the First Appellate Authority. , Taxpayers will suffer irreparable harm and it is better that the appellate tribunal hold on to this matter until the first appellate authority to dispose of the taxpayer's main appeal to the first appellate authority to deal with the appeal. Was not instructed. In 45 days

Related judgments — Inland, 2012

• TIWANA ENTERPRISES, FAISALABAD v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISALABAD 2012 PTD 925
• GREEN STAR MACHINE TOOLS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, KARACHI v. COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE (APPEAL), KARACHI 2012 PTD 928
• A.B.M. TEXTILE, FAISALABAD v. C.I.R. (LEGAL DIVISION) R.T.O., FAISALABAD 2012 PTD 931
• ALLAHDIN STEEL MILLS, S.I.E., DASKA v. C.I.R., R.T.O., SIALKOT 2012 PTD 934
• COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISALABAD v. KHALIL JUTE MILLS, FAISALABAD 2012 PTD 942
• Z.N. EXPORTS (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD v. C.I.R. (LEGAL DIVISION) R.T.O., FAISALABAD 2012 PTD 946
• DCWT, LEGAL-02, LEGAL DIVISION, R.T.O., LAHORE v. RIZWAN AMJAD, LAHORE 2012 PTD 948
• HABIB METROPOLITAN BANK, KARACHI v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FEDERAL EXCISE (APPEAL), KARACHI 2012 PTD 954

All Inland judgments of 2012 →

immigration advocates from Ghazi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes