Find a Lawyer

C.I.R., R.T.O., RAWALPINDI versus ISLAM ELLAHI, KURRALA C/O SOHAWA, JHELUM

Section 122 (c) Temporary Assessment Former Impact Revenue claimed that Section 122 (c) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 could be applied retrospectively because it was a supply of machinery, which was a procedure in nature and claimed by taxpayers. Was that Section 122 (c) was a basic provision of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, which was anticipated in nature and could not be applied with prior effect, the amending Business Ordinance 2001 through the amended Finance Ordinance of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Was introduced by No law should be given that would impair any existing rights or obligations. The basic and basic rule was that every legal rule should be considered possible unless the tax officer was justified by express delivery or by the will. Applying Section 122 (c) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, the first appellate authority for the prior tax year 2008 that Section 122 (c) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 was not applicable, was illegal in guaranteeing any interference. There was no interference because the order approved by the First Appellate Authority was not subject to appeal of any factual or legal impairment. Revenue was excluded from any qualification

Related judgments — Inland, 2012

• HABIB METROPOLITAN BANK, KARACHI v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FEDERAL EXCISE (APPEAL), KARACHI 2012 PTD 954
• AAMIR HUSSAIN v. C.I.R., R.T.O., RAWALPINDI 2012 PTD 959
• NEW DEFENCE ESTATE, 90-Y DHA, LAHORE v. C.I.R., AUDIT DIVISION-II, RTO, LAHORE 2012 PTD 1032
• COMMISSIONER (LEGAL DIVISION) INLAND REVENUE (RTO), FAISALABAD v. ZAHID JEE FABRICS (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD 2012 PTD 1040
• BANK OF PUNJAB, LAHORE v. COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, LAHORE 2012 PTD 1055
• C.I.R., LEGAL DIVISION, R.T.O., HYDERABAD v. MEMON MOTORS (PVT.) LTD., HYDERABAD.T.A. 2012 PTD 1076
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, MULTAN v. CHICAGO METAL WORKS, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, MULTAN 2012 PTD 1090
• PUNJAB BEVERAGES COMPANY (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD v. C.I.R., R.T.O., FAISALABAD 2012 PTD 1094

All Inland judgments of 2012 →

criminal advocate from Orakzai lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes