DAEWOO PAKISTAN MOTORWAY SERVICE LTD., LAHORE versus C.I.R., ZONE-II, LAHORE
Sections 140, 137, 138 and 139 of the General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 24 asks the taxpayer to collect the purse money from the tax collector without the notice of receipt of the demand by linking to the department's bank accounts. Was gone - what could be the recovery? Created without notice under section 138/139 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, the department held that the action taken under section 140 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 could not be termed a compulsory action because the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Had issued a Demand Notice under Section 137, which was a notice to the taxpayers against this action. The disclosure of the practice of recovery under section 140 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, the interpretation of the provisions of section 24A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, cannot be supported in any way. ? As part of each federal constitution, the Clause Act, 1897, requires that an authority in sub-section (2) be obliged to state the reasons and to have the effect of having an adverse effect on the person. Let me know Under Section 140 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, I should read the auditorium readme as part of every law-related account, in fact it was a drastic step when the department did not have a taxpayer's bank without its consent / permission. When it was received, it was withheld. To take any action under 5 140 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001. That is, the receipt of money after the account is linked without prior notice to the appellate authority \ r \ n
